Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Minutes
Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Metro Counties Government Center
Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, Hennepin Co.
Commissioner
Commissioner Joseph Harris, Dakota Co.
Commissioner Jim Ische, Carver Co.
Commissioner Michael Turner,
Commissioner Dick Lang, Anoka Co.
Commissioner Randy Johnson, Hennepin Co.
Commissioner Dennis Hegberg, Washington Co.
Gordon E. Wegwart, MPCA
Art Dunn, MOEA
Others
Present:
Phil Eckhert, Hennepin Co.
Brad Fields, Anoka Co.
Barry Schade, Dakota Co.
Paul Smith, MOEA
Jim
Mark Rust, MOEA
Tim Goodman, Tim Goodman & Assoc.
Irv Stern, BFI
Katy Boone, JRs Appliance Disposal
John Domke, SKB
Judy Purman, NRG Processing Solutions
Barry Tilley, SWMCB/Dakota Co.
Norm Schiferl, Ramsey Co.
Ryan O’Gara, SKB
Susan Young, City of
Dorthea Shay, Endres Processing
Doug Carnival, McGrann Shea Carnival
Amy Roering, Hennepin Co.
Garth Hickle, MOEA
Kathy Dyess, Carver Co.
Scott Vandenheuvel, Veit Companies
Mary Richardson, RRA
Peg Aho, RRA
The meeting was called to order at
Agenda Item #1. Consent Items.
a.
Minutes of the
b.
Checks & Claims.
Commissioner Turner made a motion to approve the minutes
of the
Agenda Item #2. Management
and Policy.
a.
Regional/County Solid Waste Master
Plan Approval Status Report.
Art Dunn said that OEA approved
the 2005 – 2024 Regional/County Solid Waste Master Plan. Mr. Dunn recognized that a lot of hard work
went into this plan and complimented the region on its leadership, ambitious
goals and excellent work. Mr. Dunn said the next step is for OEA and PCA to
line up its activities to support the implementation of the Master Plan.
b.
Legislative Issues.
i.
E-Waste.
Staff distributed a summary of
electronics recycling bills before the Minnesota Legislature. Commissioner Kordiak gave a brief update on
the status of the bills. Commissioner Kordiak reviewed a list of municipalities
and others in
ii.
Processing Credit.
iii.
Inverse Condemnation.
Commissioner Stafford asked
whether counties can force cities to organize collection services. Ms. Richter
replied that counties can not force cities to organize, but counties could
organize collection countywide thereby forcing the cities to give up
involvement in collection service.
Doug Carnival noted that he had
spoken with AMC and MICA and neither of these organizations had any opposition
to the bill. When cities organize,
haulers lose business without being compensated for what they are losing. He noted that there should be compensation to
a business that could no longer practice its trade.
Commissioner McLaughlin asked
about the length of obligation. Doug
Carnival noted that this law would only apply in cities that don’t currently
have organized collection. The damage to
the haulers would have to be determined by courts in ways they already use to determine
fair market value for various businesses.
Commissioner Kordiak asked if the
bill applies to cities with current contracts for waste services. Mr. Carnival replied that the law would only
apply to cities that have open collection.
Commissioner Kordiak asked if
there are examples of cities moving to single hauler collection. Mr. Carnival noted that a hauler in west
central
Commissioner Reinhardt noted the cities
usually decide to explore organized collection because they want to protect the
environment and use taxpayer dollars sensibly.
Mr. Carnival asked if there are savings in using organized collection, couldn’t
those savings be used to compensate haulers losing business.
Commissioner Harris asked if the
SWMCB had taken a position on this issue last year. Ms. Richardson indicated the proposed
amendment is similar to the position the SWMCB took last year. Commissioner Harris noted that government
makes a lot of procurement decisions, and government cannot compensate everyone
that loses by these decisions. Inverse
condemnation for garbage services could transfer to a lot of other types of
service.
Mr. Carnival noted that last
year’s bill applied to all services.
This year’s bill applies only to garbage services and counties are
exempt. Mr. Tilley noted that counties
could be included in the future.
Motion passed on a voice
vote. Dakota County Commissioner Turner
voted nay.
Mr. Tilley reviewed the
legislative tracking report dated
c.
Update by OEA on Industrial Waste
Issue.
Commissioner Reinhardt noted that there was not enough time for OEA to do an
in-depth analysis and that Ramsey and Washington Counties have seen significant
changes in how waste is being managed.
Commissioner Reinhardt noted that clearly there is a question about what
is and is not industrial waste. Commissioner Reinhardt introduced the following
proposed definition of industrial waste:
“Industrial solid waste” means
solid waste resulting from an industrial, manufacturing, service, or commercial
activity that is managed as a separate waste stream. Industrial solid waste does not include
packaging waste, unless the packaging is contaminated with material that
renders the packaging in need of special management or is incidental packaging
included with industrial waste for disposal or is packaging utilized for
transporting industrial solid waste.
Industrial solid waste does not include office materials, restaurant and
food preparation waste, discarded machinery, demolition debris, municipal solid
waste combustor ash, or household refuse.
Commissioner Reinhardt made a
motion that the SWMCB approve the proposed definition of industrial waste as
presented. Commissioner Johnson seconded
the motion.
Commissioner McLaughlin said the
SWMCB needs more time to discuss this issue because the full implications of a
definition change are not known. Commissioner McLaughlin moved to table action
on the revised language until the next meeting.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Chair
Mr. Tilley suggested that the
matter be referred to a Committee of the Chair, Vice Chair and Treasurer
because delaying the discussion to the next meeting will not meet the
legislative deadline. The Chair, Vice Chair and Treasurer could work with industry
to refine the definition and check in with members of the SWMCB before taking
action.
A friendly amendment to the motion
was made and accepted to refer the issue to the Committee of the Chair,
Vice-Chair and Treasurer to decide whether to proceed with a legislative
initiative. The decision on whether to
proceed would be made by the Committee after consultation with the other
counties and the Committee should bring the issue back to the full SWMCB for
further discussion in April. The motion
passed.
Agenda Item #3. Communications
& Outreach: Compost Bin Distribution
Program.
Mary
Richardson noted that it is the SWMCB’s goal to sell 8,000 bins and kitchen
food waste buckets during the upcoming distribution. Each bin will be sold for $30.00. Staff handed out the Free Compost, Dirt Cheap
bin distribution flyer.
Agenda Item #4. Other
There being no further business, the
meeting adjourned at