Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board
Baseline Report
1998
| SUMMARY | The Regional Solid Waste Master Plan (Master Plan) sets forth Regional Outcomes in the areas of source reduction, reduction in toxic/hazardous character of waste, recycling, processing, landfilling, and nonMSW management for the six-county area of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey and Washington. This 1998 Baseline Report documents progress toward the SWMCB Regional Outcomes. The Report also replaces program specific regional reports, including the Household Hazardous Waste Annual Report, Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Regional Annual Data Summary, Hazardous Waste Annual Report, and the Regional Hauler Licensing Annual Report. Future SWMCB annual reports will include new indicators as programs outlined in the Master Plan are implemented, particularly in the areas of source reduction, household hazardous waste and nonMSW, where new initiatives are being undertaken in 1999. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1998 RESULTS | Source
reduction is the highest priority for managing waste at the national,
state and regional level. The need for reduction is clear. Waste
generation continues to grow at increasing rates and the costs of managing
the growth in the waste stream will be significant.
Growth in Total MSW Managed (tons)
The region continues to focus on landfill abatement through increased recycling and processing to offset the trend toward greater waste generation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
MSW
Managed in 1998 (tons)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Household
hazardous waste programs continue to grow in program participation and
amount of waste collected. Collection cost per vehicle increased slightly
between 1998 and 1999. The region served over 100,000 vehicles in 1998,
collecting over seven million pounds of household hazardous waste.
The region continues to operate a regional hauler licensing program, issuing 245 base licenses and 650 operating licenses for the 1998-99 license year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SOURCE REDUCTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME: | From 2005
through 2017, per capita and per employee MSW generation rates will be no
higher than the 1999 rates.
Introduction Source reduction, often called waste reduction or waste prevention, is
the highest priority for managing waste at the national, state and
regional level. The need for the reduction priority is clear. Waste
generation continues to grow at increasing rates and the costs of managing
the growth in the waste stream will be significant. If the waste is
reduced at the source, these management costs will be avoided. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Total
Amount of MSW Managed (tons)
About the Indicator Total MSW managed includes tons managed through recycling, problem
materials managed, processing and landfilling. It does not include yard
waste. Counties track this data through municipal recycling reports and
facility reports. The commercial recycling tonnage is a combination of
documented recycling and an estimate. Appendix A shows a breakdown of
county specific MSW management, as well as a breakdown of processing and
landfilling. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Total
Population and Amount of MSW Managed Per Person and Per Employee (tons)
Source: County SCORE and Certification Reports; Metropolitan Council Population and Employment Projections.
About the Indicator The MSW stream is estimated to be comprised of 45% residential waste
and 55% commercial waste. Appendix A shows a breakdown of county specific
MSW management, as well as a breakdown of processing and landfilling
practices. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The SWMCBs
materials exchange program (MAX) is an active, regional program that
reduces business solid and hazardous waste by connecting businesses that
no longer want a material with businesses that are in need of that
material. MAX maintains and distributes a list of materials that are
available and actively seeks out businesses that are likely to be in need
of those materials. Materials
are listed in a catalog and on the World Wide Web.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| REDUCTION
IN TOXIC/HAZARDOUS CHARACTER OF WASTE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME 1: |
By 2003, the toxic/hazardous character of MSW will be
reduced. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME 2: |
By 2017, manufacturers and retailers will take responsibility for consumer products that contain toxic or hazardous components when the product becomes waste. Introduction The Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan requires the region to give source reduction and the reduction of toxic/hazardous waste the highest priority in planning for and development of the regional solid waste management system (Policy 5.1.2.1). The Regional Solid Waste Master Plan includes implementation strategies to support achievement of outcomes, including: The following indicators demonstrate achievements of county and
regional programs. Further gains in the area of product stewardship are
expected in the future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Total
Vehicles Served at HHW Sites
About the Indicator Vehicles served represents a general indication of the level of
participation in HHW programs. Counties also estimate number of households
served based on information provided by participants. In 1998, 103,425
vehicles represented 121,892 households served or about 13% of the number
of households in the region. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Total
Amount of HHW Managed (Pounds)
About the Indicator Some wastes are weighed, such as batteries, but many of the waste
streams are measured with volume measures such as gallons or drums. These
volume measures are converted to pounds so that a total figure can be
calculated and trends assessed. Conversion factors are based on actual
samples of wastes collected at metropolitan program sites. Collection of
electronic equipment began in 1996, which is partly responsible for the
increase in household hazardous waste collected from 1995 to 1996. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Program
Cost Per Vehicle
About the Indicator Appendix B shows a breakdown of 1997 and 1998 costs. Cost per vehicle is the figure used by counties as the basis for
reciprocal use charges. Costs reflected here are net of certain revenues
such as donations, reimbursements, citizen fees, etc., which represent
approximately 5% of total program costs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Number
of Licensed Hazardous Waste Generators
About the Indicator Appendix C shows a breakdown of large, small, and very small quantity
generators licensed in the region. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Number
of Licensed Hazardous Waste Inspections
About the Indicator Appendix C shows a breakdown of inspections performed in the region. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RECYCLING |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME: | Collectively,
the region will achieve at least a 50% MSW recycling rate (including a 3%
source reduction and 5% yard waste credit) every year, through 2003.
Introduction Recycling is an integral component of the integrated waste management
system and supports the Policy Plan goals of landfill abatement, resource
conservation and generator responsibility. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Amount
of MSW Recycled as a Percentage of Total MSW
About the Indicator Recycling percentage is calculated first as a tonnage percentage of
total MSW. From there, counties are authorized by the Minnesota Office of
Environmental Assistance to add a credit of up to 8% to the tonnage
percentage if waste reduction and yard waste programs are in place. A
significant portion of commercial recycling is estimated tonnage.
Residential tonnages are documented through municipal programs and
drop-off sites. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PROCESSING |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME: | By 2017,
the region will process 65% of the MSW that has not been reduced or
recycled.
Introduction The Policy Plan provides that it is the Policy of the region that all MSW that is not reduced or recycled will be processed to the extent feasible (Policy 5.3.2.1). The regions waste is primarily processed at HERC, NRG Newport and
NSP Elk River. Total capacity at these three facilities is estimated to be
1,165,000 tons. The percent of available capacity that is used at any
point in time may fluctuate based on a variety of considerations,
including markets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Net Tons
of MSW delivered for processing
About the Indicator Net tons of MSW are the tons of MSW delivered for processing that were
actually processed. Excess and non-processible waste is MSW that was
delivered to processing facilities or transfer stations for processing,
but because of capacity constraints or other issues, could not be
processed. Appendix A shows a breakdown of county specific MSW management,
as well as a breakdown of processing and landfilling practices. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Percent
of available waste processed
For Comparison About the IndicatorThis percentage reflects the amount of waste available for processing
(processed and landfilled waste) that was actually processed. Appendix A
shows a breakdown of county specific MSW management, as well as a
breakdown of processing and landfilling practices. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LANDFILLING | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME: | Capacity
for MSW will be available in sanitary landfills through the year 2017 for
MSW that cannot be reduced, recycled, or processed.
Introduction Landfills have a role in the
integrated solid waste management system and sufficient capacity is needed
for waste that cannot be reduced, recycled or processed. However,
landfilling is the least preferred management strategy. The Policy Plan
recognizes that the private sector has primary responsibility for the
delivery of landfilling services (Policy 5.4.2.2). The regions role
will be that of system assessment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13. AMOUNT OF UNPROCESSED MSW LANDFILLED
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Amount of
unprocessed MSW landfilled
About the Indicator 1995 landfilling is understated because total excess and non-processibles landfilled was not reported. Excess and non-processibles are wastes that were delivered to the
processing facility or transfer station, but were not able to be processed
due to capacity constraints or other operational issues. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SOLID WASTE REGULATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PRINCIPAL OUTCOME: | The Master
Plan does not contain an outcome for solid waste regulation.
Introduction The Policy Plan indicates that an integrated solid waste management system requires responsible solid waste collection practices that protect the public health, safety and welfare. The State, region, counties, cities, towns, waste collectors and waste generators should work together on solid waste collection issues (Policy 5.6.2.1). To that end, the metropolitan counties, through the SWMCB regional hauler licensing program, regulate the collection and transportation of MSW within and between member counties. The Regional Hauler Licensing Program which began in 1995 provides for
the issuance of one base license by the county in which the hauler is
based and an operating license by each county in which a hauler operates.
The base license provisions, including insurance requirements, fees,
hauler application form and license year are consistent throughout the
region. Each county involved in the regional hauler licensing program has
individual authority to enforce licensing requirements and/or take action
against a hauler violating such requirements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NUMBER
OF BASE AND OPERATING LICENSES ISSUED
Source: SWMCB Regional Hauler Licensing Program Annual Reports. About the Indicator The number of licenses issued changes throughout the year. Though applications for the following license year are due May 1 of each year, licenses are also issued upon request throughout the year because new haulers enter the market, mergers and acquisitions occur and requests for changes to the haulers area of operation are made. Self haulers are also included in the license data. The indicator represents the number of haulers licenses in August of each year.Scott County will continue its involvement in the Regional Hauler
Licensing Program through June 30, 1999. Therefore, the data presented
includes Scott County licenses. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
LICENSE
FEES COLLECTED
Source: SWMCB Regional Hauler License Program Annual Reports. About the Indicator The fees collected do not include late application fees. The data
presented includes Scott County license fees collected. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||